Major Decisions-New Jersey v. T.L.O.

Major Decisions-New Jersey v. T.L.O.

Share

Major Decisions-New Jersey v. T.L.O.

The Supreme Court has an extensive history in
hearing cases in which the Amendments contained in the Bill of Rights
 are the issue of an alleged
violation or infringement situation. However, the majority of the cases deal
with adults in real world situations. On certain occasions, the question as to
how the Constitution applies to students or those not legally considered adults
arises.

A case in the 1960s, known as
Tinker v. Des Moines
, is an
example of students and the application of Constitutional rights. The subject
would arise some twenty years later once again in New Jersey v. TLO.

The case of New Jersey v. TLO is in regards to a student being
searched on school grounds because she was thought to be smoking in a
non-smoking area of the campus. Even though TLO–such as the girl was referred
to due to her name not being released because of her age–denied the
accusations of her smoking, she was brought to the principal’s office. Once
there, the assistant vice-principal searched TLO’s purse, in which she found
marijuana, several forms of paraphernalia, and letters that indicated that she
was involved in dealing marijuana at her school. Subsequently, TLO would be
brought up on charges by the local police and sentenced to one year probation.

The matter was brought to the
New Jersey Supreme Court, in which the probation charges were overturned on the
grounds that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution had been violated on
TLO’s behalf. The State of New Jersey would then appeal to the United States
Supreme Court.

Warren E. Burger was the Chief Justice presiding over New Jersey v.
TLO. After reviewing the case and the application of the Fourth Amendment
 under
these circumstances, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of New Jersey. The Fourth
Amendment was used to argue that the search conducted by the school official
was unwarranted, and therefore, a violation of TLO’s Constitutional rights.

The main
issue at hand was that even though the Fourth Amendment is to be applied to all
people of the United States, in certain instances there has to be a balance in
which its application cannot extend its limits that disrupt certain procedures
affecting safety and the overall well-being of a group of people. Such was the
case in New Jersey v. TLO, in which it was determined that a school or
educational setting warrants some modification regarding the scope in which
student’s rights are applied.

Though the
Supreme Court did not denounce that the Fourth Amendment did not apply to
students, a certain consideration to its application in this type of setting
required some lax interpretations. The Fourth Amendment states that a search
and seizure cannot be lawfully conducted without a warrant or probable cause.
However, in a school setting, a search is considered to be reasonable and
within the constraints of the Fourth Amendment if there is reasonable suspicion
that criminal activity is suspected. However, the Supreme Court also rested its
decision that such types of searches are to be conducted by the school
themselves and that if law enforcement was to be involved, it could be in
breach of a student’s Fourth Amendment rights.
 

Comments

comments

Share

Related Articles


Read previous post:
Understanding the 17th Amendment

Close