are defined as that which are representative of issues of indecency and
profanity that remain at odds with aspects of morality. They are believed to be
existent with relation to the possibility of violations of the law. In relation
to the legal system, obscenities may be employed in relation to various terms,
such as that of war and economics.
differences that exist depending upon the region or culture involved, the United
States does possess specific laws concerning that of censorship of such implied
obscenities. In general this category of law most often includes that of the
regulation of pornography.
United States Constitution. Obscenities, according to the Constitution, is
defined as the exhibition of sexual practices in an offensive manner in ways
that have no connection whatsoever to serious aspects of literature, art,
politics, or science. Due to the censorship of obscenities, such as that of
pornography, there does remain a serious issue for legal consideration.
referencing the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court sets forth that the
term obscenity be defined such as that which may directly infer sexual acts
that may be wholly accessible to the general public. Differences between
varying areas of obscenities may also be distinguished according to the ways in
which specific local courts litigate them. Obscenity law set forth by the Federal
Government is unique in that it guarantees the variations in what is deemed as
obscene depending upon the specific area of jurisdiction.
In order to provide a firmer grasp on issues of obscenity
as outlined by the Federal Government, we may reference that of the Supreme
Court case of Miller v. California. This case ruling led to the creation of the
“Miller test”, essentially a 3 part test instituted to ascertain what
is deemed obscene and not. In addition, the Supreme Court also ruled as to the
place limitations upon the sale, conveyance, or transmission of items of
case that dealt with the production of “non-image-based” obscenity
was that of Dunlop v. the United States, which maintained that it was illegal
for the newspaper, The Chicago Dispatch, to be conveyed through the mail to
consumers as it contained multiple obscenities. Cases such as this presented
the precedence by which future hearings on obscenity will be heard and ruled.
There do exist, however, critical dialogue concerning obscenity law.