Arguments & Importance of The Federalist Paper

The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay between October 1787 and August 1788. These essays were meant to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution and were published in newspapers throughout the country under the pseudonym “Publius.”

The importance of The Federalist Papers cannot be understated. It not only led to the ratification of the Constitution but it also provided a comprehensive explanation of the principles and reasoning behind the Constitution. These essays have had a tremendous impact on US politics and the legal system, serving as a cornerstone for legal arguments and political thought.

In this article, we will explore the arguments presented in The Federalist Papers and how they have impacted US politics and the legal system.

1. The Federalist Papers were written to promote the ratification of the Constitution.

The Constitution was not universally accepted when it was first presented to the states for ratification. Many people, including influential leaders such as Patrick Henry, opposed the Constitution because they believed that it would give too much power to the federal government and that it lacked protections for individual rights. The Federalist Papers were written to address these concerns and to explain why the Constitution was necessary for the success of the new nation.

2. The Federalist Papers explained the principles behind the Constitution.

The Federalist Papers were not just a defense of the Constitution, but they also provided a detailed explanation of the principles that guided the creation of the Constitution. These principles included separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

3. The Federalist Papers discussed the role of the federal government.

Hamilton, Madison, and Jay believed that a strong federal government was necessary to ensure the success of the new nation. They argued that a weak federal government would lead to chaos and instability. They also believed that the federal government needed to have certain powers, such as the power to regulate commerce and coin money, in order to function effectively.

4. The Federalist Papers discussed the protection of individual rights.

One of the main concerns of those who opposed the Constitution was that it did not include a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties. The Federalist Papers addressed this concern by arguing that the Constitution itself provided protections for individual rights. They also pointed out that the addition of a Bill of Rights would be unnecessary, as the Constitution already limited the powers of the federal government.

5. The Federalist Papers provided a defense of the Electoral College.

The Electoral College is often criticized today for being undemocratic and for giving too much power to certain states. However, The Federalist Papers provide a detailed defense of the Electoral College, arguing that it was necessary to ensure that the president was selected by a broad base of voters and that it would prevent corruption and foreign interference in the election process.

6. The Federalist Papers discussed the dangers of factions.

Hamilton, Madison, and Jay were concerned about the dangers of factions – groups of people who were united by a common interest or passion that was opposed to the general welfare. They argued that factions could easily take over the government and that the only way to prevent this was to create a large republic in which there would be many different factions competing against each other.

7. The Federalist Papers provided a blueprint for the separation of powers.

The principle of separation of powers is a cornerstone of the US government. The Federalist Papers provided a blueprint for how this principle should be implemented, with the legislative, executive, and judicial branches each having distinct but limited powers.

8. The Federalist Papers discussed the importance of the judiciary.

The Federalist Papers recognized the importance of an independent judiciary to ensure that the rights of individuals were protected. They argued that the judicial branch needed to have the power to interpret the Constitution and to strike down laws that were unconstitutional.

9. The Federalist Papers argued for a strong military.

Hamilton, in particular, believed that a strong military was necessary to protect the new nation from foreign threats. He argued that a weak military would invite aggression from other countries and that the federal government needed to have the power to maintain a standing army.

10. The Federalist Papers have had a lasting impact on US politics and the legal system.

The Federalist Papers have been cited in countless court cases and have informed legal arguments on a wide range of issues. They have also influenced US political thought and provided a foundation for modern political ideologies.

In conclusion, The Federalist Papers is a timeless work that continues to inform and influence US politics and the legal system. The arguments presented by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay have shaped our understanding of the Constitution and the principles that govern our government. Its influence can be seen in the development of political thought and legal theory. The Federalist Papers is not just a historical document but a foundational text that continues to shape our understanding of democracy and the rule of law.

---

The primary goal of the publication of The Federalist Papers was to serve as a portable advocate for the ratification of the Constitution. However, the authors of The Federalist Papers were well-aware of the implications of any doctrine that was considered to be dogmatic: the ambiguity of interpretation. The polarity between ‘written’ and ‘oral’ translation was of great concern to Hamilton, Madison, and Jay. The advent of technology, progress, and future enlightenment left little room for any permanence. The authors viewed the absolute power of archaic doctrines to be akin the absolute power of a totalitarian ruler. Yet, the two authors of The Federalist Papers (Madison was in favor of the Bill of Rights) were opposed to the creation of a Bill of Rights, a document that could potentially serve as a vehicle to ensure the relevancy and timelessness of the Constitution.

The creation of a Bill of Rights would allow the principals and focal points of the Constitution to evolve in tandem with the evolution of the society that it serves. However, two of the authors of The Federalist Papers were adamant about not only regulating the power granted to individuals, but the transfer and distribution of that power as well. For instance, Hamilton regaled in the ambiguity of the Constitution’s text because it never concluded a finite amount of rights to which each citizen of that nation would be entitled. He feared that if a Bill of Rights were to be constructed, then that would create a limit to the rights of the citizens.

He feared that the creation of limitation would remove the equilibrium that existed between government body and the citizens it served. Many political thinkers of the time disagreed with the logic of the two authors of The Federalist Papers, claiming that the lack of definition – paired with the abundance of ambiguity – would propel the citizens of the nation into slavery. Critics of The Federalist Papers claimed that by disallowing amendments to a dogmatic doctrine (under which a nation were to be ruled), such limitations would jeopardize the relevancy of the document and future citizens might be subject to archaic laws. In addition, many suggested that the modification of a dogmatic document allowed the current governing body – whose prime concerns would be that of its citizens – would allow for more citizen’s rights because it would cater to the needs of modernity, rather than the stale needs of antiquity.

Hamilton was concerned with preventing the oral translation of a dogmatic doctrine. By doing so, the Constitution would be impervious to both human error, as well as any self-serving gains of a single individual. However, many argued that the establishment of a governing body as a ‘servant’ of its citizens ensures that not only will power be dispersed fairly among multiple governing factions, thus preventing tyranny, but also solidifies that the role of a democratic government will always include the service of its citizens.

The dispute between oral and written translation was a target of debate during the deciding moments of the ratification of the Constitution. Though the two opposing authors of The Federalist Papers were opposed to the fate of a dogmatic doctrine being resigned to the translation or interpretation of a human being, the Bill of Rights was passed in 1791.