Home Constitutional Amendments Understanding the 27th Amendment

Understanding the 27th Amendment

Understanding the 27th Amendment

The United States Constitution is a cornerstone document that has guided the country’s governance since the nation’s founding. It has been amended a total of 27 times for various reasons, including to expand the rights of citizens and refine the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches of government. The 27th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is the most recent of these amendments. This article will discuss the specifics of the 27th Amendment in the context of its place in American history, its influence on the country’s future direction, and how it compares to constitutional amendments in other countries around the world.

The 27th Amendment was adopted on May 5, 1992, but its origins can be traced back to the early years of the United States. In fact, it was one of the 12 original amendments proposed in the first year of the country’s operations as a nation. However, it would take roughly two centuries for it to be ratified. The amendment reads: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.”

This amendment is deceptively simple but its implications are significant. In essence, it means that if Congress votes to raise its own pay, the raise won’t take effect until there’s an election. This amendment arose from concerns about the temptation politicians would face to serve their own interests, rather than those of their constituents. It was believed that only by impeding the ability of politicians to raise their own remuneration could public trust in the nation’s congressional leaders be maintained.

In the early days of the country, ratios between salaries were often set very high; this was done to ensure that only the wealthy could take office and that they would not need to be compensated greatly for their services. Over time, however, this led to the concentration of power in the hands of a small number of wealthy individuals. To remedy this, the 27th Amendment sought to link congressional salaries to the votes of the people. This way, the people would have the final say on whether their representatives were deserving of a pay raise or not.

The passage of the 27th Amendment was a slow and patient process. It was obtained only after years of hard work and lobbying by activists and lawmakers. This is remarkable in itself; by contrast, some of the better-known amendments, such as the 19th Amendment (which guarantees women the right to vote) and the 14th Amendment (which grants citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the U.S.), were ratified much more quickly. In fact, the length of time it took to ratify the 27th Amendment was so lengthy that many people thought that it would never become part of the Constitution. It was only when Gregory Watson, a student at the University of Texas in Austin, wrote a term paper on the subject in 1982 that the ratification process was reactivated. Watson contacted state legislators across the country and worked tirelessly to get them to pass the resolution required to ratify the amendment. In the end, Maine became the 38th state to ratify it in 1992, and it became a part of the Constitution.

One of the most significant impacts of the 27th Amendment is that it places a higher level of accountability on U.S. politicians. In some cases, lawmakers may be tempted to use their position to pass laws that benefit themselves financially. By tying congressional pay increases to the election process, the Constitution places the power back in the hands of the constituents. This is a critical safeguard against corruption, and it helps to ensure that members of Congress focus on the needs of their constituents rather than their own personal interests. As a result, the 27th Amendment is one of the key components of the nation’s anti-corruption infrastructure.

In addition to its impact on U.S. politics, the 27th Amendment has also influenced the development of laws in individual states. Many state constitutions have included provisions similar to the 27th Amendment, which helps to ensure that politicians at the state level are also held accountable to their constituents. For example, the constitution of the state of Pennsylvania reads: “The compensation of the members [of the General Assembly] shall not be increased during their term of service.”

Another important impact of the 27th Amendment is that it demonstrates the resilience of the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the Constitution has been amended numerous times to meet the changing demands of the times. The 27th Amendment is an interesting case study in this regard because its passage was so lengthy and difficult. It demonstrates that the Constitution is not merely a static document, but rather a living document that can adapt to meet the needs of the people.

In general, the 27th Amendment is seen as being unique when compared to other constitutional amendments adopted in other countries around the world. In many countries, politicians are free to set their own salaries, which creates a significant risk of corruption. The 27th Amendment is one of the few measures in place worldwide that specifically seeks to address this issue.

One disadvantage of the 27th Amendment is that it only covers Congress and not the executive branch of government. As a result, the president, vice president, and other members of the executive branch can still vote themselves pay raises without the accountability measures in place that apply to Congress members.

In conclusion, the 27th Amendment is an important component of the United States’ political infrastructure. By tying congressional pay raises to the results of elections, it helps to ensure that members of Congress remain accountable to their constituents. The amendment is a testament to the resilience of the U.S. Constitution and its flexibility in adapting to meet the changing needs of the times. While it is unique compared to many other constitutional amendments around the world, it still has some limitations and can only apply to Congress. Overall, however, it has been instrumental in maintaining the integrity of the U.S. political system and preventing corruption within the nation’s legislative branch.


The Twenty-Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution is by far the longest any Constitutional Amendment has taken to be ratified by the states. Its initial proposal began in 1789, and it took over two hundred years to complete the ratification process, finally ending in 1992.

The 27th Amendment deals with the salary of the members of Congress. It prohibits any law from increasing or decreasing the salary from taking effect and being implemented until the next term of office for the House of Representatives. The 27th Amendment is the most recent Constitutional Amendment to have been ratified, occurring on May 5th, 1992.

Its proposal was submitted on September 25th, 1789. The 27th Amendment was created with the purpose of limiting the power of the members of Congress to pass laws that would affect pay increases in their salaries which would create an obvious conflict of interest. The restriction would be necessary in order for Congress to keep in mind the needs of the people of the United States rather than their own.

The 27th Amendment would require that any call for salary increases to be imposed were to occur after an election. This would prevent members of Congress from immediately causing a salary increase when elected into office. In other words, Representatives must survive the election process before a raise in salary can take effect.

The provisions held within the 27th Amendment were originally discussed in the North Carolina convention held in 1788, which was held for the purpose of discussing the Constitution itself. The 27th Amendment was originally drafted and proposed by James Madison, but it was not ratified by the necessary number of states. Only six states would approve ratification: Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Delaware, Vermont, and Virginia; a total of ten was required for ratification. It was during this time that the first ten Constitutional Amendments were ratified, which would eventually become theUnited States Bill of Rights.

The 27th Amendment has a peculiar history because of the simple fact that it took hundreds of years to be ratified. The proposal for this Constitutional Amendment was considered to be discarded and invalid during most of the time between its initial proposal and final ratification. A student from the University of Texas, Gregory Watson, can be attributed to having reawakened and sparked life back into what would become the 27th Amendment.

In 1982, Watson would stumble upon the legislation and make it the topic of a research paper. He would eventually set out to devote his personal time and efforts to make the ratification of this Constitutional Amendment a reality. During this time, pay raises would become the focus of public debates and disputes that were instituted by State legislatures.

The concern would once again be turned to the salaries of Congress. States would begin to reconsider the Constitutional Amendment, but because of its initial introduction some 200 years prior, many did not believe that the legislation would ever be ratified. However, by May 7th, 1992, Michigan would become the necessary thirty-eighth state to ratify the provision, thus making it the 27th Amendment.